Researched by the Ignaria Editorial Team · Updated 2026-07-04
The disagreement between John Calvin and Jacobus Arminius over predestination is one of the defining fractures in Protestant theology. Calvin locates election and reprobation solely in God's sovereign pleasure — rejecting foreknowledge as the "mother of election" and insisting that God passes by the reprobate for no cause but his will. Arminius defines predestination as God's eternal decree to justify and endow with everlasting life those on whom he had decreed to bestow faith — making faith both the object and the condition of the decree. Their contrast is not merely terminological: it concerns whether the divine decree precedes or follows the human response of faith.
Your research brief
This page is a summary. Your research brief is a working document.
Run the same question in Ignaria and get blockquoted primary sources you can refine, export, write from, and share.
-
Refine with Research Builder
Ask follow-up questions and deepen your line of inquiry — one brief becomes a research session.
-
Export for your projects
Pull blockquoted, cited passages into sermons, articles, and study notes.
-
Write in Ignaria
Turn your research brief into a finished article without leaving your thread.
-
Share when you're ready
Publish publicly on your profile, or share privately with colleagues on Pro.
1 free search · No account needed to start
What the primary sources show
"Those, therefore, whom God passes by he reprobates, and that for no other cause but because he is pleased to exclude them from the inheritance which he predestines to his children." — Calvin on reprobation as twin expression of unconditional divine sovereignty.
"Predestination… is the decree of the good pleasure of God in Christ, by which he resolved… to justify, adopt and endow with everlasting life… believers on whom he had decreed to bestow faith." — Arminius makes faith the condition distinguishing the elect.